directed by Jean-Luc Godard
Bardot and Piccoli have a much-needed relationship chat. |
It often seems to be that 'the point' of Godard is to piss us off. He makes some pretty absurd statements about American businessmen in the first twenty minutes. And then, Piccoli's writer character, Javal, does some pretty silly things, which the film community still argues over to this day. The trouble is, it's not sensible, and there's not 'a point'. Godard is playing with our emotional reactions in a crude way; we're supposed to feel certain things, but we're not supposed to understand the film as a logical whole. It's a weird medium between thinking a little, but then not too much. I've wondered sometimes if Godard weren't mocking the literati elite; you could pontificate about this one for hours, and yet not say anything really meaningful.
Bardot turns in the best performance of the lot. She's a much better actress than we give her credit for; we're too often distracted by her status as a sex symbol.
It's a frustrating movie at times, but perhaps this is on purpose. Unlike many film critics, I think that attempting a big-budget, "American" style production was a brilliant decision on Godard's part; it emphasizes his strengths as a remarkable visual storyteller. Perhaps under-appreciated upon it's release, Contempt has been enjoying a deserved second look from cinephiles over the past couple of years.
No comments:
Post a Comment